Bizzo Casino Australia 2026 Review: The Grey Market Payment Trap

Bizzo Casino operates under a Curacao licence, which means precisely nothing for Australian player protection. The brand sits in that awkward space where thousands of offshore operators live: technically reachable, legally exposed, and structurally unable to offer the dispute resolution guarantees a licenced Australian wagering provider must maintain. The contrast between Bizzo and a regulated operator like TAB or Sportsbet starts at the foundation. One side answers to a state regulator. The other answers to a corporate entity in the Caribbean.

This article breaks down how Bizzo actually functions for Australian players, what happens when a deposit gets blocked, why ACMA keeps adding its mirrors to the DNS blacklist, and where the legal alternatives stand. No version of this ends with a recommendation to deposit. The numbers and the regulatory mechanics make that conclusion independently.

What Bizzo Casino Actually Is

Bizzo launched around 2021 through a Curacao-based operating company. The licence number on its site refers to Antillephone N.V., one of the old-style Curacao master licence holders. This is a different animal from a state gambling authority. Australian licences require corporate identity checks, anti-money-laundering protocols audited by a government body, and direct accountability to a minister. A Curacao arrangement offers none of that. If your withdrawal vanishes, the regulatory path involves emailing a Caribbean master licence office that processes complaints in months, not days.

Ownership and Licence Reality

The business structure matters because it determines what happens when something goes wrong. A regulated Australian provider signs a contract enforceable in Australian courts under Australian consumer law. A Curacao-licenced offshore casino signs terms that route disputes through arbitration clauses most Australian lawyers would describe as unfriendly terrain. The practical outcome: if Bizzo decides to freeze an account pending KYC verification, the player writes to a support desk. If a licenced Australian bookmaker pulls the same move, the player files with a state ombudsman.

Why Australians Land on This Brand

Search volume for Bizzo spikes around bonus-hunting periods. The hook is simple: large welcome packages, cryptocurrency acceptance, and a game library from Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, and other recognised studios. But marketing reach doesn’t equal legal standing. A grey market brand can advertise through affiliates and social channels that regulated operators cannot use. That visibility gap makes Bizzo feel mainstream. It is not. The contrast with TAB’s state-licenced sportsbook, which carries mandatory responsible gambling messaging and direct regulatory oversight, shows what true mainstream actually looks like.

The Australian Legal Threshold: IGA 2001 in Practice

The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 prohibits interactive gambling services being offered to Australian residents. That law hasn’t been softened. Online casino gameplay for real money sits outside the legal framework for both operators and the payment channels that feed them. Bizzo is not prosecuted for being offshore; it is simply operating without an Australian licence because no Australian jurisdiction issues one for online casino products.

Online Casino Gaming Is Already Illegal for Providers

Here is the uncomfortable core. A provider like Bizzo does not hold, nor could it obtain, an Australian online casino licence. The IGA makes offering casino-style games to Australians an offence for the provider. Contrast that with Sportsbet, Ladbrokes Australia, and TAB, all of which hold state and territory wagering licences and operate under enforceable responsible gambling codes. The legal difference is not a technicality. One business model is permitted and supervised. The other survives because enforcement targets infrastructure, not individual players.

What ACMA Does When It Catches a Grey Market Brand

The Australian Communications and Media Authority maintains an active blocking program. Since 2019 ACMA has compelled internet service providers to block over 800 illegal gambling sites. Bizzo has cycled through multiple domains and mirrors, which tells you exactly how the regulator treats the brand. When a site is added to the blocklist, every major ISP — Telstra, Optus, Vodafone, TPG — redirects or drops DNS resolution for that domain. A regulated operator never faces this. Crown Resorts and The Star do not run from ACMA. They answer to state casino inspectors.

Payment Blocking: How Australian Banks React

Australian financial institutions began tightening gambling payment controls around 2020, and the trend accelerated through 2023-2025. The Australian Banking Association published guidelines encouraging member banks to restrict or block gambling transactions processed through high-risk merchant codes. Offshore casinos, including Bizzo, carry exactly those codes. Meanwhile, regulated wagering operators process payments through non-gambling or approved merchant categories, which means a TAB deposit goes through smoothly while a Bizzo deposit gets declined mid-transaction.

Credit Card Restrictions

Visa and Mastercard both enforce gambling merchant category codes that many Australian banks apply as automatic declines. An attempt to deposit at Bizzo using a Commonwealth Bank or Westpac credit card frequently returns a blocked transaction notification within seconds. Sometimes the card issuer holds the funds for days before releasing them. At a regulated operator, the same card works because the merchant category and regulatory status satisfy bank risk rules. The contrast is mechanical. The blocked payment isn’t a glitch; it is the banking system correctly identifying an unlicensed gambling merchant.

PayID and Bank Transfers: The Blocked Path

PayID deposits at Bizzo sound convenient in marketing copy until you try one. Australian banks flag and block PayID transfers to unlicensed gambling merchants. Some banks still process smaller transactions but block larger ones without notice, leaving the player unsure whether funds arrived. At regulated operators like TAB or The Lott, PayID and bank transfers function as ordinary transactions because the receiving entity is on an approved list. That difference will never disappear while Bizzo remains unlicensed.

DNS Blocking: ACMA’s Technical Net

When ACMA publishes a block decision, Australian ISPs must implement it within a defined window. The mechanism is technical but the effect is blunt: typing the blocked domain into a browser returns an error page or redirect. Bizzo has featured on ACMA’s blocked list through several domain iterations. Each time the brand rotates to a new URL, the regulator takes weeks to catch up, and players chase mirrors in forums. This cat-and-mouse cycle never happens with Crown or Star, which operate under state licensing and public accountability.

How DNS Blocking Works in Australia

DNS blocking means your internet provider stops resolving the website address. The site itself still exists on a server somewhere. ACMA compels the ISP to redirect or refuse lookup requests. For a player, that failure appears as a dead link. For regulated operators, DNS resolution is never interfered with because the operator holds licences that ACMA recognises. This technical distinction explains why Bizzo constantly publishes new domain names on affiliate forums while Sportsbet and TAB keep stable, permanent URLs.

Why Mirrors Only Make the Problem Worse

When a blocked casino spins up a mirror domain, the player has already stepped into a substandard environment. The mirror domain typically lacks the same security certificate history, may be operated by a third party, and carries higher phishing risk. Regulated operators do not need mirrors because their primary domains are never blocked. The mirror ecosystem around Bizzo serves as an ongoing reminder that the operator is working around Australian enforcement rather than complying with it.

Bonuses at Bizzo: The Numbers Worth Doing

The $300 free chip and thousands in welcome bonus credit look generous until the wagering requirements appear. Bizzo advertises deposit matches and free spins with playthrough conditions that range from thirty to forty-five times the bonus amount. Run the math and the structure reveals itself. A regulated Australian operator cannot legally offer online casino bonuses at all, because the product itself is not licensed. The contrast: any bonus at Bizzo is a marketing instrument for a product Australians cannot legally access, while responsible gambling rules on regulated wagering platforms cap promotional intensity.

A $300 Bonus Is a Calculation, Not a Present

Take a hypothetical $300 bonus with 35x wagering. The player must turn over $10,500 before withdrawal eligibility appears. On slots with a 96% RTP, the expected loss over that volume is around $420. That means the “bonus” costs more in expected losses than it provides in promotional credit. Regulated Australian platforms cannot offer such structures for casino games, so any comparison with TAB bonus bets or Ladbrokes promotions fails on the most basic regulatory level. The offers exist in separate universes.

Wagering Requirements and Actual Cost

Some Bizzo promotions carry 40x wagering. The required playthrough climbs to $12,000 on a $300 bonus. Expected loss at 96% RTP reaches $480, exceeding both the bonus and the original deposit combined. These are not rewards. They are volume obligations designed to keep players betting. A regulated Australian operator, subject to strict harm minimisation rules, cannot deploy promos engineered around such intense wagering. The structural difference between a grey market bonus and a regulated betting promotion is not cosmetic; it is baked into the mathematics.

Games and Software: What You Can Actually Play

Bizzo carries titles from Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Microgaming, Evolution, Hacksaw Gaming, and Push Gaming. That catalogue looks identical to what a legal Australian casino would offer if online casinos existed legally here. The difference sits in the regulatory frame around each game. Licensed Australian clubs and pubs operate poker machines under state inspection. Grey market casino slots operate under no Australian supervision at all. RTP figures published on offshore sites are not verified by any Australian authority.

Providers Behind the Slots

Pragmatic Play and NetEnt build for global distribution. Their RTP settings vary by market. In regulated jurisdictions, the return-to-player percentage must fall within published ranges and is often audited. For a Curacao-market configuration targeting Australians, no Australian auditor checks the RTP. The same game at Bizzo may carry different payout mathematics than what a player experiences at a land-based venue or a regulated international site. That gap is invisible to the average player and exists precisely because no Australian licence is involved.

Live Dealer and Its Legal Gap

Evolution powers Bizzo’s live dealer section. Live casino games are not offered by Australian-licenced online operators at all because the underlying game type is prohibited online under the IGA. The only licenced live tables in Australia belong to land-based casinos like Crown Melbourne and The Star Sydney. A grey market live dealer stream from Evolution at Bizzo occupies the exact regulatory space the IGA was written to close. The contrast with a regulated Crown live table, where every dealing procedure is audited, could not be sharper.

Legal Alternatives: Regulated Australian Options

Online casino gameplay is not legally available to Australian residents, period. What remains legal is structured: sports betting, racing wagering, lottery products, and keno all operate under state licences. Any article that suggests Bizzo as a substitute for these products is ignoring the IGA. The honest comparison runs the other direction. If you want the casino experience inside a supervised environment, you visit Crown or Star as a land-based guest. If you want online wagering with Australian consumer protections, you use TAB, Sportsbet, or Ladbrokes Australia.

Regulated Betting, Racing, and Lottery: The Licenced Side

TAB holds state licences across multiple jurisdictions and processes PayID deposits without blocks. The Lott runs state lottery draws with published odds and regular audits. Sportsbet and Ladbrokes Australia operate under Northern Territory and other state wagering licences. Every one of these operators appears on bank-approved merchant lists, processes withdrawals in predictable timeframes, and answers to a gambling regulator. Bizzo answers to none of those authorities. The difference in accountability is the difference between a governed product and a grey market one.

Land-Based Casinos vs Offshore: A Structural Comparison

Crown Resorts in Melbourne and Perth, The Star in Sydney, Brisbane, and the Gold Coast, and smaller venues across the country all operate under state regulatory regimes. Poker machines at licensed venues are inspected, RTP ranges are set by regulation, and staff receive responsible gambling training. Bizzo offers the same game categories but outsources all of that oversight to a Curacao shell. That is not an alternative casino model. It is a different and substantially riskier product wearing the same name.

Withdrawal Delays and Account Freezes at Bizzo

Regulated Australian platforms have published withdrawal windows: TAB processes bank transfers within one to two business days, Sportsbet commonly within 24 hours, and Ladbrokes Australia within 48 hours. These timelines exist because the operators answer to regulators that monitor payout complaints. Bizzo operates under no comparable oversight, so withdrawal times stretch from three days into weeks, particularly when a large amount is requested. The delay often triggers a verification demand that arrives only after the withdrawal button is pressed.

When a player chases a $500 payout at Bizzo, the support team may ask for a utility bill, a bank statement, a selfie with ID, and sometimes a source-of-funds declaration. A regulated operator verifies identity once at registration or at first withdrawal, under Australian anti-money-laundering law, with clear and consistent requirements. At Bizzo, the verification loop is not standardised. Different support agents request different documents. That inconsistency is not poor training; it functions as a retention mechanism. The longer an account stays locked in review, the higher the probability the player reverses the withdrawal and continues gambling.

By contrast, a TAB or Bet365 Australia withdrawal to an Australian bank account rarely triggers additional verification because the operator already collected identity documents under AUSTRAC-backed protocols. The bank recognises the merchant and processes the transfer. No document roulette occurs. That difference alone should end the argument about where Australian players stand.

The KYC Trap at Grey Market Casinos

Bizzo markets “instant withdrawals” on affiliate pages, but the fine print conditions those payouts on account verification and wagering completion. The term “instant” refers to processing speed after approval, not the approval itself. A player who deposits $200, wins $600, and requests withdrawal can expect an email requesting passport scans and a utility bill before any money moves. Regulated operators like Neds or BlueBet process withdrawals without requiring the player to resubmit documents they already supplied at sign-up.

The operator’s legal obligation is another differentiating factor. Australian wagering providers operate under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, which mandates certain verification standards. A Curacao-licenced casino has no binding Australian AML obligation. It collects documents by policy, not law. When a withdrawal request stalls, the player has no Australian regulator to contact. They can email the Curacao master licence holder or a third-party complaints panel, none of which has authority over Australian financial institutions.

Run the contrast against PointsBet Australia, which lists its dispute resolution pathway on its website and falls under Northern Territory Racing Commission supervision. If PointsBet wrongly withholds a payout, the player files a complaint that reaches a regulator with actual enforcement power. If Bizzo withholds a payout, the player updates a forum thread and waits. The asymmetry is structural, permanent, and unfixable without an Australian licence.

Payment Blocking in Action: What a Declined Deposit Reveals

Australian banks do not block gambling transactions uniformly, but they consistently decline deposits to unlicensed offshore casinos. Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB, and ANZ have all published responsible gambling controls that include restrictions on gambling merchants. When Bizzo uses a merchant code associated with casino games, the bank’s compliance system flags it. The player sees a generic “transaction declined” message, often without explanation. Some customers call the bank and learn the payment was blocked because the merchant is an unlicensed gambling operator.

The same $50 or $100 transaction to TAB or The Lott processes instantly. The bank’s risk engine recognises the merchant as licenced, the transaction category as permitted, and the receiving entity as regulated. That is why PayID deposits to Bizzo sometimes fail while PayID transfers to TAB never do. The banking system assigns different risk scores based on the destination account, not the player’s personal history. Using a different card or a different bank does not change the classification; it only shifts the problem to another institution’s compliance queue.

Some players attempt to bypass the block by purchasing a prepaid Visa card or a Neosurf voucher and using that at Bizzo. The casino accepts these methods. What the player misses is that the block was not a technical error to be routed around; it was a signal that the operator sits outside Australian regulation. A regulated operator never requires such workarounds because it already holds the licences that satisfy bank policies. Every workaround is a layer of risk the player adds voluntarily.

PayID, BPAY, and POLi: The Legal Alternatives

The regulated side offers payment methods that work cleanly. PayID is supported by TAB, Sportsbet, Ladbrokes Australia, and Neds for instant deposits from Australian bank accounts. BPAY remains available at several licenced operators, and POLi, now owned by Australia Post, connects directly to bank accounts for approved merchants. None of these methods requires a crypto on-ramp or a prepaid voucher purchased at a corner store. They function because the operator holds an Australian gambling licence and appears on bank-approved merchant lists.

Bizzo, by contrast, promotes Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies as privacy-oriented deposit options. Crypto doesn’t interact with Australia’s regulated payment rails. That means the bank never sees the transaction, which also means the player loses any chargeback rights. If a credit card deposit to an Australian bookmaker goes wrong, the card network provides dispute channels. If a Bitcoin deposit to Bizzo goes wrong, the transaction is irreversible and the casino’s support desk becomes the only point of contact. The privacy pitch is not a convenience; it is a removal of consumer protection.

Comparison Table: Bizzo Casino vs Regulated Australian Operators

Feature	Bizzo Casino	Regulated Operators (TAB, Sportsbet, Ladbrokes, Neds, PointsBet)
Licence	Curacao (Antillephone N.V.), no Australian recognition	State/territory wagering licences (NSW, QLD, VIC, NT, etc.)
Online casino games	Offered, illegal for Australians under IGA 2001	Not offered; illegal product for online wagering providers
ACMA blocking	Domains and mirrors on ACMA blocklist	Never blocked; licensed and compliant
Payment processing	Declined by major Australian banks; requires crypto or prepaid workarounds	PayID, BPAY, POLi, credit cards processed routinely
Withdrawal speed	3-7+ days, frequent KYC re-verification, delayed payouts	24-48 hours typically, predictable, regulated timelines
Dispute resolution	Curacao complaints process, no Australian authority	State gambling regulator, AUSTRAC obligations, enforceable
Responsible gambling tools	Basic self-exclusion, no OASIS equivalent, no Australian-mandated links	Deposit limits, time-outs, self-exclusion via Australian schemes
Game fairness audits	Unverified RTP, no Australian auditor	N/A for casino games; racing/sports odds under regulatory scrutiny

The table shows the gulf in structural protections. Not a single row favours Bizzo from a consumer safety perspective. Regulated operators cannot offer online casino products, so the comparison is not “which casino is better”; it is “which environment protects you when something goes wrong.” The regulated environment does. The offshore environment does not.

Red Flags That Reveal a Grey Market Casino Before You Deposit

Recognising the pattern saves money and time. A website that rotates domains frequently is a clear signal. Bizzo has operated under multiple mirror URLs since its launch, and ACMA has added several to its blocklist. Regulated operators maintain stable domains for years because they never face blocking orders. If a casino advertises a new URL on a forum signature or affiliate Telegram channel, the reason is enforcement, not marketing creativity.

Another red flag is the absence of Australian responsible gambling resources. TAB and Sportsbet include links to national and state gambling helplines, self-exclusion tools, and deposit limit settings mandated by their licences. Bizzo may mention responsible gambling in its footer to satisfy Curacao policy expectations, but the links point to generic international services, not Australian bodies. The player seeking a self-exclusion from a regulated provider uses a state scheme. The player seeking one from Bizzo emails a support desk that may or may not act.

The third red flag is payment friction. If a credit card is declined at an online wagering provider, the likely cause is that the operator is not licensed in Australia. A regulated provider rarely triggers declines because banks whitelist its merchant category. So every blocked deposit is not just an inconvenience; it is a diagnostic result. The bank performed a risk assessment and failed the merchant. That finding should redirect the player to a legal alternative, not to a prepaid voucher shop.

What Responsible Gambling Looks Like Under Australian Regulation

Australian states and territories fund gambling support services and mandate that regulated operators integrate them. The National Gambling Helpline on 1800 858 858 operates 24 hours. State regulators enforce deposit limit tools. OASIS does not exist in the same form as Germany, but each state runs its own self-exclusion register for venues and online wagering. A regulated operator participates in those schemes by law. Offshore casinos like Bizzo have no legal requirement to connect to any Australian self-exclusion database.

The practical impact shows up in every session. A player who sets a deposit limit at TAB gets that limit enforced across TAB products. A player who asks Bizzo for a limit has only the operator’s goodwill. If the operator ignores the request, no regulator will act. If a regulated operator ignores a limit, the state regulator levies fines and the player has legal recourse. That distinction is not theoretical. It is the difference between a product governed by Australian harm-minimisation law and a product governed by an offshore marketing team’s goodwill.

For anyone experiencing gambling harm, helplines and counselling services operate locally. Gambling Help Online offers free chat and phone support. State-based services such as Gambler’s Help in Victoria and BetStop in NSW (note: BetStop is the Australian self-exclusion register for online wagering, launched 2023) provide concrete tools. A grey market casino cannot register you with BetStop because it does not hold an Australian licence. A regulated operator must. So the player who is serious about controlling their gambling should never use an unlicensed site because the most important safety tools are unavailable there.

Why Search Rankings Don’t Mean Safety

Bizzo appears in search results for “Bizzo casino Australia” because affiliates build pages targeting that query. Search engines index those pages regardless of legal status. The presence of a polished review does not signal regulatory approval. ACMA does not issue licences to online casinos, so any Australian-facing casino review for an offshore brand is describing an illegal product. The same search for “legal online wagering Australia” returns TAB, Sportsbet, Ladbrokes, Neds, and Bet365 Australia. The contrast in results reflects the contrast in legal standing.

The affiliate economy around grey market casinos uses welcome offers as bait. A $300 free chip sounds like a reason to sign up, but the wagering math ensures the operator’s expected return exceeds the bonus value. Regulated operators cannot offer such promos for casino games because the product itself is not licensed. So the promotional language itself is a red flag. Any site offering a “no deposit bonus for Australian players” is describing an unlicensed product. That simple heuristic eliminates most online casino review pages Australia sees.

By contrast, a regulated operator’s promotional material focuses on racing and sports betting bonuses with clear terms and responsible gambling notices. Every TAB or Ladbrokes promotion carries a link to state gambling help services. Bizzo’s promotional material rarely mentions Australian support numbers. That omission is not accidental; it reflects the operator’s legal position and its target market’s legal exposure.

The Economic Cost of Playing Offshore: A Worked Example

Let’s run a simple expected loss calculation for a typical Bizzo slot session. A player deposits $200 and receives a $200 bonus with 35x wagering on the bonus. The player must wager $7,000 before withdrawal. On a Pragmatic Play slot configured at 96% RTP, the house edge is 4%. Expected loss over $7,000 wagered is $280. The bonus credit is $200. The player is expected to lose $280, meaning the net expected value is negative $80 before the original deposit is considered. And that assumes the RTP is actually 96%; offshore operators can and do configure slots at lower RTP settings without Australian audit requirements.

Now compare a legal alternative. A player bets $200 on a fixed-odds racing market at TAB. No wagering requirement applies to withdraw winnings. The operator’s margin is built into the odds, roughly 5-10% depending on the market. The player can withdraw after a single bet, win or lose. There is no lock-up period, no KYC roulette, no irreversible crypto transaction. The structural difference is not about odds; it is about whether the player retains control of funds. Regulated wagering keeps the player in control. Grey market casino play locks the player into a volume obligation.

The $280 expected loss on the Bizzo bonus is a calculated number derived from RTP and wagering. It is not a worst-case scenario; it is the average across many players. For every player who wins, many lose more than the average. The operator’s edge compounds across thousands of sessions. That is how the business stays profitable while offering “free chips” to everyone. No charity is involved.

FAQ: Direct Answers on Bizzo Casino Australia

Is Bizzo Casino legal in Australia?

No. Bizzo Casino operates under a Curacao licence but holds no Australian state or territory gambling licence. Online casino games are prohibited for Australian providers under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. ACMA can and has blocked Bizzo domains. Playing at Bizzo from Australia means using an unlicensed, illegal operator.

Can Australian banks block deposits to Bizzo Casino?

Yes. Major Australian banks including CBA, Westpac, NAB, and ANZ restrict transactions to unlicensed gambling operators. Credit card and PayID attempts are frequently declined. Regulated operators like TAB and Sportsbet process the same methods without issue because they hold Australian licences and appear on approved merchant lists.

Why does Bizzo keep changing domains?

Bizzo rotates domains because ACMA orders Australian ISPs to block its primary URLs. Each time a domain is blocked, the casino launches a mirror to evade DNS filtering. Regulated operators never change domains for this reason because they are not subject to blocking orders.

Can I withdraw winnings from Bizzo using PayID?

Not reliably. Bizzo advertises PayID, but Australian banks often block or delay PayID transfers to unlicensed gambling merchants. Even when a deposit succeeds via PayID, withdrawals are subject to lengthy verification and can be refused or delayed. Regulated operators process PayID withdrawals within one to two days.

What are the alternatives to Bizzo Casino in Australia?

There are no legal online casino alternatives in Australia. Legal online wagering consists of sports betting, racing betting, and lottery products from state-licensed operators such as TAB, Sportsbet, Ladbrokes Australia, Neds, and The Lott. For casino-style games, visit a licensed land-based venue like Crown or The Star.

Does Bizzo Casino have responsible gambling tools for Australians?

No meaningful ones. Bizzo may offer generic deposit limits, but it is not connected to Australian self-exclusion registers like BetStop or state responsible gambling frameworks. Regulated Australian operators must connect to these services by law. Playing offshore removes access to the standard protections Australian law provides.

Final Assessment: The Decision Writes Itself

The analysis runs down a single line. Bizzo Casino offers online casino games without an Australian licence. The product is illegal for providers under the IGA. Payment channels block it. Regulators blacklist it. And its bonus structures mathematically favour the house over any real promotion. Meanwhile, regulated Australian wagering operators offer legal products with bank-friendly payments, state-level dispute resolution, and mandatory responsible gambling tools. The contrast appears in every row of the comparison table.

If you deposit at Bizzo, you accept every risk the banking system and the regulator were designed to warn you about. If you choose TAB, Sportsbet, or Ladbrokes instead, you operate inside a framework that protects the player. That is not opinion. It is a legal and structural fact. The casino may present itself as a bold alternative to regulated wagering, but the label “alternative” hides what it really is: a grey market product with no Australian safety net. You get a nice slot library and a Curacao logo. You lose the legal recourse, the payment stability, and the help services that matter when something goes wrong. The trade is poor. The decision writes itself.