Your building compliance audit checklist

Use this as a practical building compliance audit checklist to work through in the weeks before your audit. It doubles as a fire safety inspection checklist and an essential safety measures checklist.

Documentation

• Essential safety measures logbook is complete and up to date
• All servicing records are present, dated and signed by the contractor
• The current annual statement (AFSS or AESMR) is lodged and on file
• Building plans and evacuation diagrams match the building as it stands today

Essential safety measures and fire services

• Fire detection and alarm systems serviced within their required interval
• Sprinklers, hydrants and hose reels serviced and unobstructed
• Fire extinguishers in place, tagged and in date
• Exit and emergency lighting tested and functioning

Egress and passive measures

• All exits clear, accessible and unlocked in the direction of egress
• Exit signage present, illuminated and visible
• Fire doors close, latch and seal correctly, and are not propped open
• Paths of travel unobstructed and to required widths

Housekeeping

• No storage blocking egress paths, switchboards or fire services
• Defects from the last inspection have been rectified and recorded

Anything you cannot tick is an action item – and finding it now, rather than on audit day, is the whole point.

Walk the building the way an assessor will

With the checklist in hand, walk the building as an assessor would. Start at the entry, follow each path of travel to a final exit, and look at what they will look at: blocked egress, missing or unlit signage, propped fire doors, obstructed extinguishers, storage where it should not be. Seeing the building through the assessor’s eyes surfaces the practical issues that records alone will not show – the pallet parked in front of a hydrant, the exit door that sticks. These are usually quick to fix, but only if you spot them first.

Reason 1 – Essential safety measures aren’t being maintained

This is the most common cause by a wide margin. Every essential safety measure has a required servicing frequency, and every service is supposed to be recorded. When a servicing contractor changes, a logbook goes missing, or a routine inspection slips off the calendar, the measure may still be physically present but is no longer demonstrably compliant.

Consistent essential safety measures compliance comes down to a maintained schedule and a complete logbook. If you cannot produce a record showing a measure was serviced on time, from a compliance standpoint it may as well not have been.

Reason 2 – The annual statement lapses or is signed without evidence

Each year, most commercial buildings are required to certify that their essential safety measures have been assessed and are performing – through an Annual Fire Safety Statement in New South Wales or an Annual Essential Safety Measures Report in Victoria.

Two things go wrong here. The statement lapses entirely because no one owns the deadline, or it gets signed without the underlying servicing records to justify it. Both are compliance failures, and the second is the more dangerous, because it looks fine on paper right up until someone asks for the evidence behind it.

Reason 3 – The building changes but the paperwork doesn’t

Commercial buildings aren’t static. Tenants fit out, walls move, use changes, new equipment arrives. Each of those changes can affect fire compartmentation, exit paths or the essential safety measures schedule – and yet the compliance documentation often stays frozen at the last version.

When a fitout blocks an exit path, alters a fire-rated wall, or makes an emergency evacuation diagram inaccurate, the building has changed but its compliance record has not. That mismatch is a defect waiting to be found.

Reason 4 – Fire safety defects go unaddressed

Inspections and audits exist to surface defects, but surfacing them only helps if the defects are then closed out. A known issue – a faulty exit sign, an obstructed egress path, a fire door that no longer latches – that sits open between inspections is a live compliance and safety risk.

Unresolved fire compliance issues tend to accumulate, and they’re exactly what a building surveyor or auditor looks for. Tracking every defect through to rectification, with a record of when and how it was fixed, is what separates a well-run building from one heading towards a notice.

Reason 5 – No one clearly owns compliance

In a lot of commercial and strata buildings, responsibility for compliance is shared between the owners corporation, the building manager and individual tenants – which too often means no one owns it in practice. Everyone assumes someone else is handling the servicing, the statement and the records.

Compliance needs a clear owner: a single point of accountability who tracks obligations, deadlines and defects for the whole building. Without one, tasks fall through the gaps between parties, and gaps are where non-compliance lives.

Don’t respond off the cuff – get a compliance assessment first

Before you reply, have the building assessed by a fire and safety compliance consultant. A considered response backed by evidence carries far more weight with a building surveyor than a rushed assurance that everything is fine.

A proper assessment tells you what the notice is really driving at, whether the identified defect is the whole story or the tip of a larger issue, and what rectification will genuinely be required. It is the difference between responding to the letter of the notice and actually resolving the underlying compliance gap.

This is the point at which many owners and owners corporations bring in specialist help. EBC Group’s council building notice and order consultation is built for exactly this moment – assessing what is required, so your response is accurate the first time.

Prepare and lodge your written response and rectification plan

With the assessment done, respond in writing. A strong response does three things:

• It addresses each point the surveyor raised
• It presents evidence of current compliance where it exists
• It sets out a clear rectification plan with a realistic timeline for anything outstanding

Detail matters here. A plan that names the specific works, the standards they will meet, and the dates by which each will be complete demonstrates that you are taking the matter seriously and gives the surveyor a reason to work with you rather than escalate. Achieving building order compliance is rarely about doing everything overnight – it’s about showing a credible, evidenced path to resolution.

Keep a copy of everything you lodge (you may need it later).

Rectify the defects and have the works certified

Once your plan is accepted, carry out the works and gather the documentation as you go. Servicing records, compliance certificates and completion documentation are what actually close the notice out – verbal assurances do not.

Depending on the building and the state, this may culminate in an updated fire safety statement or report – an Annual Fire Safety Statement in New South Wales, or an Annual Essential Safety Measures Report in Victoria – confirming the relevant measures have been assessed and are performing as they should. Make sure every rectified item is properly certified and recorded, so there is no ambiguity if the building is reviewed again.

What can happen if your records are missing?

The impact of missing building compliance records depends on the nature of the building, the records involved and whether a regulator, council, insurer, purchaser or tenant is asking for information. However, there are several common consequences.

Annual reporting becomes harder

Many Australian buildings are subject to annual fire safety or essential safety measures reporting requirements. In NSW, for example, building owners may need to lodge an Annual Fire Safety Statement. In Victoria, relevant buildings may require an Annual Essential Safety Measures Report. Other states and territories have their own obligations, terminology and processes.

These reports aren’t prepared in isolation; they depend on accurate supporting documentation. If essential safety measures records are incomplete, it can be difficult to confirm what needs to be inspected, whether the correct maintenance has occurred, whether the correct standard has been applied, and whether previous defects have been addressed.

This can delay annual reporting and create unnecessary pressure close to lodgement deadlines. In some cases, missing records may mean additional investigations, site inspections or document reconstruction work are needed before a statement or report can be completed with confidence.

A fire compliance audit may identify gaps

A fire compliance audit is often where record issues become visible. An audit may compare the building’s required fire safety measures against the records available and the systems installed on site. If the documentation doesn’t align, the auditor may identify gaps that need to be resolved.

For example, a building may have fire doors, emergency lighting and sprinkler systems installed, but no clear record showing that each measure has been inspected and maintained at the required intervals. Alternatively, the available schedule may list systems that are no longer present, or fail to list systems that have been added through later works.

These gaps don’t always mean the building is unsafe, but they do mean the compliance position is unclear. That uncertainty needs to be addressed.

A good audit shouldn’t simply list problems; it should help owners and managers understand what’s missing, what needs verification, what requires rectification and what documentation should be established going forward.

Defects may be missed or left unresolved

One of the biggest risks with poor record management is that defects can fall through the cracks. A contractor may identify an issue during routine servicing, but if the report isn’t reviewed, saved and tracked, the defect may remain unresolved. Over time, small issues can become larger compliance and safety concerns.

This is particularly important for fire and life safety systems. A blocked path of travel, damaged fire door, faulty emergency light, impaired sprinkler component or unresolved alarm defect may affect the building’s ability to protect occupants in an emergency. Proper records help ensure defects aren’t only identified, but also prioritised, actioned and closed out with evidence.

Council or authority requests become more difficult to answer

Building owners and managers may be asked to provide records during council reviews, fire authority inspections, building notices, orders, audits or compliance investigations. When documentation is current and organised, these requests can usually be managed with far less stress. When records are missing, the response becomes more complicated.

You may need to contact previous contractors, search archived emails, review old plans, inspect the building again, obtain replacement documentation, or engage specialists to help establish the current compliance position. Delays or incomplete responses can increase scrutiny and may lead to further questions, directions or enforcement action, depending on the circumstances.

Insurance and liability issues may arise

Insurers often expect building owners to maintain appropriate safety systems and keep evidence of inspections, maintenance and defect rectification. If there’s an incident and key records can’t be produced, it may be harder to demonstrate that the building’s fire and safety obligations were being properly managed (this can create additional complexity around claims, liability and risk management).

The same issue can arise during disputes, lease negotiations, property transactions or due diligence reviews. Missing fire safety records may raise concerns for purchasers, tenants, insurers, committees or asset managers who need confidence that the building has been responsibly maintained.

Compliance costs can increase

Record gaps are usually cheaper and easier to fix early. When documentation has been neglected for years, the process of rebuilding the compliance picture can take more time. It may require a detailed site review, comparison against historical approvals, liaison with council or contractors, review of maintenance standards, identification of installed systems, defect inspections and the creation of new registers.

That work is often necessary, but it can be more involved than maintaining clear records from the beginning. In practical terms, poor documentation can turn a manageable annual process into a larger compliance recovery project.

The main difference between AFSS vs AESMR

The AFSS and AESMR both support ongoing fire safety compliance, but they’re not interchangeable. In NSW, the AFSS is tied to the fire safety schedule and must be lodged annually with council and Fire and Rescue NSW. In Victoria, the AESMR confirms the maintenance of essential safety measures and must be kept with supporting records, ready to produce when required.

The purpose is similar: safer buildings, stronger accountability and clear evidence that life safety systems are being maintained. The process is different, and building owners need to manage each one according to the relevant state requirements.

Why do these reports matter?

It’s easy to treat fire safety reporting as paperwork; that’s where risk starts to creep in. An Annual Fire Safety Statement or Annual Essential Safety Measures report provides evidence that the systems designed to protect occupants are being inspected, maintained and documented. These systems may sit quietly in the background most of the time, but in an emergency they need to work immediately. A properly managed AFSS or AESMR helps building owners identify defects, reduce enforcement risk, support insurance and liability management, maintain better records and protect tenants, residents, staff and visitors.

The value isn’t just in the final document; it’s in the process behind it.

H2: Common issues for building owners

Many fire safety compliance problems come back to poor documentation. Older buildings, strata properties, refurbished sites and buildings with multiple agents over time often have incomplete records or unclear compliance histories. Common issues include missing fire safety schedules, outdated maintenance records, unresolved defects, unclear contractor scopes, inaccurate measure lists and due dates being tracked manually. These gaps can delay inspections, affect lodgement and increase regulatory risk; it’s far easier to fix them early than to rebuild the compliance picture days before a deadline.

Who’s responsible?

In both NSW and Victoria, the building owner carries the core responsibility. An agent, strata manager, facilities manager or contractor may coordinate parts of the process, but the owner must ensure the correct measures are maintained, records are retained, defects are addressed and annual reporting obligations are met. Engaging contractors isn’t the same as managing compliance; owners still need a clear system for tracking what’s been inspected, what’s been certified, what’s still outstanding and what evidence is available.